We respect your privacy
Mneme AI only uses cookies strictly necessary to operate the platform. You can customise your preferences at any time. Learn more
Who uses FacilityOne?
FacilityOne is primarily adopted by North American real estate portfolio managers — universities, hospitals, multi-site retail, enterprise real estate. The historical positioning is centered on CMMS (Computerised Maintenance Management System): asset tracking, work orders, preventive scheduling, field technician management.
The target audience is more operations / maintenance than pure IoT: users are facility managers, maintenance technicians, planners. The real-time IoT layer is a recent extension, not the historical core.
Why consider SensIa vs FacilityOne
If you're a FacilityOne user looking elsewhere, it's probably for one of these reasons:
- You need native real-time IoT — LoRaWAN / Zigbee sensors, live dashboards, sub-second alarms — and FacilityOne's IoT layer isn't enough
- You want a 3D BIM digital twin where your sensors are visually placed in space, not just on 2D plans
- You want native AI predictive maintenance (RUL, unsupervised anomalies) without paying for a separate module
- You want transparent self-service pricing without personalised quote for each evolution
Note: FacilityOne remains stronger on field CMMS (work-order workflows, native mobile app, technician management). SensIa targets IoT supervision more than operational CMMS.
Key stack differences
Functional domain. FacilityOne is primarily a CMMS extended to IoT. SensIa is primarily an IoT smart building platform that can trigger external tickets via webhook.
Data model. FacilityOne revolves around the asset and work order. SensIa revolves around the sensor / equipment and real-time measurement.
Analytics approach. SensIa natively integrates 3D BIM and predictive AI (RUL, MTBF, anomalies). FacilityOne offers these features via add-on modules depending on the tier chosen.
Pricing. FacilityOne operates on personalised quotes, no public pricing. SensIa publishes its 5 plans in self-service.
Coexistence and migration
If you already use FacilityOne for CMMS and want to add SensIa for real-time IoT:
- Coexistence by webhook — SensIa rules can trigger work-order creation in FacilityOne via webhook when an alarm fires. SensIa does real-time IoT, FacilityOne does CMMS
- Pilot on a building — equip one building with LoRaWAN and Zigbee sensors, onboard SensIa, keep FacilityOne for CMMS. Evaluate 2-3 months
- Progressive switch — if you want to consolidate on SensIa, plan a CMMS layer upgrade (later roadmap phase)
Who SensIa fits best vs FacilityOne
SensIa is the right answer if:
- Your priority is real-time IoT supervision and 3D BIM, not work-order management
- You want public self-service pricing without personalised quote
- You're in Europe and France GDPR hosting is a criterion
- You want native AI predictive maintenance without add-on module
FacilityOne remains relevant if:
- Your core business is extended CMMS (work orders, technician management, field mobile)
- You operate primarily in North America
- You need a native mobile app for field technicians (SensIa's PWA is responsive but not a native app)